As kids, we are taught 1 + 1 = 2. As we get older, it’s always nice to think of ways to make 1 + 1 = 3. When you make that happen you know you are leveraging your efforts for more significant impact, and getting greater value along the way.
When the four ingredients of a student engagement plan are put together properly, schools can indeed create a 1 + 1 = 3 dynamic. We refer to this as the Student Engagement Flywheel.
Each component links to another in a continuous cycle where the only outcome is success. Success for the school (hitting enrollment and retention targets) and success for the student (graduation, employment, advanced educational opportunities).
The coordination and collaboration of various technologies through a single platform, and a single source of truth drive the success of the Flywheel. Consider these four (4) core platform components:
The combination of content and technology, coupled with a thoughtful strategy of how and when to deploy them, are at the heart of a sound engagement strategy. These tools enable a college or university to support students in a variety of ways: through education, outreach reminders, and timely nudges to name a few. Analytics then provide the necessary insights to measure which student engagement tactics are the most impactful, the best times to run activities, and which ones are most appreciated by students and prospects. They are the foundational components of the Flywheel, as the image below illustrates.
Let’s go back to our 1 + 1 = 3 concept. Where does the extra “1” come from? It’s the technology that scales the work of the staff. Without it, we are left with the old 1 + 1 = 2 model, which was sufficient when higher education was in a “steady-eddy” growth pattern. That’s not the case today. Colleges face an existential crisis from enrollment and financial pressures. Technology is the critical piece that will enable colleges to succeed in the new normal.
We should not view technology in and of itself as a source of “magic beans.” Rather it’s the technology – paired with a thoughtful strategy – that can be a vehicle through which the institution can scale the efforts of the staff. Scale is needed for the institution – no matter whether it’s small or large – to drive financial viability and vitality in the coming years. As vitality grows, there are more resources available to invest in students, staff, faculty, and programs. This, in turn, drives student interest and student success.
The key to increasing enrollment and retention is doubling down on student engagement – which requires a commitment to a strategy (and the appropriate technology) to help support it. While there is certainly more than one approach it boils down to covering your bases on student outreach, support, education (non-academic), and analytics.
The Student Engagement Flywheel can help your institution strategically implement a 360-degree approach – empowering your institution to both serve and support students (and lead them to success) proactively and reactively to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Remember, the appropriate tools and technology, coupled with a thoughtful strategy, measurement plan, and staff support, can help accelerate the path to higher levels of student engagement.
The overarching challenge of the moment is how to create a connected, personalized, yet still deeply human experience for our students — it can be helpful to reframe each challenge as an opportunity.
Improving the student experience requires a strategic approach that helps institutions to meet individual student needs by augmenting and scaling human efforts.
Higher education is yet to realize the full potential of artificial intelligence. Innovators see AI as an opportunity to improve administrative efficiency and impact student experience…
As enrollment and student outcomes remain under the microscope in the media, politics, and within our institutions, college and university leaders face immense pressure to scrutinize their own data to identify and address barriers to student success.
Address the one common factor we see that sabotages institutions’